|
From a developer perspective I tend to agree with Joe. Although, I'd bewilling to bet that DB2 LUW has a larger development budget than the DB2
From an administrator perspective, DB2 LUW, at a glance, looks like itneeds a lot more baby sitting and administration.
date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:14:10 -0600
from: Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: DB2 vs MySQL ... Oh I have learned a lot!
Hi Joe
There are some things that IBM i got first - so we're not so much the
redheaded stepchild anymore. It was something recent - maybe
row-column-access-control - I forget at the moment.
Vern
On 1/13/2016 12:16 PM, Joe Pluta wrote:
-snip-
Me, I'm more upset that DB2 LUW always outpaces DB2 for i, but I've
learned to live with being the last one at the table. Even a slightly
backward version of DB2 is indeed one heck of a powerful engine, and
there's absolutely nothing in the industry like the embedded RPG
integration.
In my (not so) humble opinion, of course. :)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.