Re: IPv6 Inside the DC (WAS Re: IPv6 disable - yes or no , and which method)

The effort to use "dual stack" seems easier than preventing IPv6 from
starting, and keeping "out of IPv6" will probably become harder.
That is why I sugest to begin using it now.

There are only small gains, if you are using NAT IPv6 will simplify your
network.
Again, with NAT, if a fraud is traced to your IP, can you find the gilty
user?

On 03/29/2015 01:47 PM, DrFranken wrote:

Paul,

What is the gain inside the DC for moving to IPV6?

I get that globally IPV6 is beyond needed, no argument. For an
organization to go through the effort (planning, equipment changes,
documentation, training, TESTING etc) just to be able to say 'We run
IPV6' isn't enough.

- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

www.frankeni.com
www.iDevCloud.com
www.iInTheCloud.com

On 3/27/2015 5:21 PM, Raul A Jager W wrote:

I sugest you to change your plans, and begin the switch to IPv6 ASAP.
Not doing so will "reinforce" the image of the AS/400 and sucesors as
obsolete.

On 03/27/2015 10:42 AM, Steinmetz, Paul wrote:

-- Este e-mail fue enviado desde el Mail Server del diario ABC Color --
-- Verificado por Anti-Virus Corporativo Symantec --