×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
<snip>
On the flip side I have customers with IBM i 7.1 as a host partition
with nothing but NWSSTG filling the disk to 95%. They have been that way
for over a year and a half with no issue whatever because those things
are written to their full size when built and never move. The I/O is
just within them.
</snip>
This sounds like our RACK#HST lpars.
They still have a lot of free space.
Many of the lpars they host are running somewhat high.
Current Current
System System % of ASP %
Name ASP Used Busy
-------- -------------- -------- ----
MAIL3 1,304,932 87.4734 0
MAILTWO 2,870,769 85.6758 0
MAIL1 2,870,769 83.5124 0
GDWEB 447,411 83.2338
GDI 596,548 77.1158
GDISYS2 1,174,438 75.3184
GDISYS 1,565,918 72.0907
GDIHQ2 5,219,580 68.2793
GDIHQ 5,480,559 65.2312 0
RACK2HST 22,500,008 64.2266
RACK1HST 23,277,381 54.3078
GDWEB2 447,411 51.3064
RACK3HST 5,956,700 45.8073
GDWEB3 447,411 39.0542
Only checked % Busy on 4 of these lpars other than the RACK#HST lpars I
reported on in an earlier email.
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This thread ...
RE: Disk: Percent full a performance factor?, (continued)
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.