MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » MIDRANGE-L » August 2014

RE: Any Reason Not To Have an RDB Directory Entry with Same Name



fixed

subject: Any Reason Not To Have an RDB Directory Entry with Same Name
onBoth Partitions of a Physical Box?

I've got a machine with two partitions installed by primary software vendor and we also have a product from the same vendor that accesses the production partition using MS SQL Server. We recently had a problem with the MS SQL based application and had to restore files for them to pull data into the data warehouse. I repeatedly had to let them know that the Initial Catalog they needed to use for the second partition where I had restored the files they needed. I was thinking of making an RDB Directory Entry on the second partition that matched the first partition just to make all our lives easier in the future, but I was wondering if there is a reason not to that I may be missing.

Coy Krill
Core Processing Administrator/Analyst
Washington Trust Bank

Don't do it...the first thing that comes to mind is that a sql connections between the two partitions will fail (same database name).

________________________________

This email message, including any attachment(s) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately contact the sender by email.






Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact