There was a similar thread a while back...search for
"massive document storage in the IFS - how to handle Mimix"
On 7/16/2014 3:31 PM, Charles Wilt wrote:
Interesting thought...though I assume you meant BLOB instead of CLOB...
Based on what little I know about how BLOBs are stored and the fact that
the OS backs up large objects faster than a bunch of small ones, I would
expect the answer to be yes.
But I don't know for sure. Might be worthwhile asking IBM about.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Roger Harman <roger_harman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
After reading a number of posts over time about slow IFS save issues, I was
Would there be any benefit to saving them as CLOB's in a table instead of
I have no experience whatsoever with this but just wondering what are the
pro's & con's and if anyone has tried it.
COMMON Certified Application Developer - ILE RPG on IBM i on Power
OCEAN User Group <http://www.ocean400.org/> - Vice-President, Membership
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives