MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » MIDRANGE-L » July 2014

Re: table indexes



fixed

The boss said to do it so yes, it is necessary. "'Shut up' he explained" remains my favorite quotation of all time. :)

One question that comes to mind is: Will the records need to be processed sequentially? I ask this because I have seen files with several fields as key and the first or second key is unique. Or, conversely, uniqueness requires all fields, and processing with less than the full key leads to unexpected results. In other words, design decisions that didn't do what the designer thought they were doing.

I put this out there as a discussion point, in case there are some implications you might want to prepare for as a result of this design decision.


On 7/10/2014 1:16 PM, Dave wrote:
Hi,

I have a table with an index already on Columns 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Now I've been told we need another one on Columns 1, 2 and 3.

Is that necessary? I don't see why.

Thanks






Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact