Agreed that on other platforms this is basically normal and expected
behavior. On IBM i it did not used to be possible and I 'assumed' it
still was not. Perhaps this changed with the move to SAS??
- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis
On 4/27/2014 5:44 AM, Wilson Jonathan wrote:
That's fairly standard for raid, the device with the least amount of
storage is the maximum unit size of all members of the raid array.