Agreed that on other platforms this is basically normal and expected behavior. On IBM i it did not used to be possible and I 'assumed' it still was not. Perhaps this changed with the move to SAS??

- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

On 4/27/2014 5:44 AM, Wilson Jonathan wrote:

That's fairly standard for raid, the device with the least amount of
storage is the maximum unit size of all members of the raid array.

This thread ...


Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page