Agreed that on other platforms this is basically normal and expected behavior. On IBM i it did not used to be possible and I 'assumed' it still was not. Perhaps this changed with the move to SAS??

- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

On 4/27/2014 5:44 AM, Wilson Jonathan wrote:

That's fairly standard for raid, the device with the least amount of
storage is the maximum unit size of all members of the raid array.

This thread ...


Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2015 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact