I know, this does not make sense.
I actually did NOT permanent apply the V6R1 PTFs.

Here's my thought. All my V7R1 CUM, PTFS were pre-applied and part of the DSLO image.
So all the space normally taken CUM, PTFs, etc, does not exist.
Does this make sense?
I'm still comparing PRTDSKINF from before and after the upgrade, searching for differences.


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 9:29 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: V6R1 to V7R1 i5/OS DSLO image upgrade issues

Perhaps it was the permanent application of PTFs? Or any number of things...

Rob Berendt

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2015 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact