× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On 13 Sep 2013 11:34, Cyndi Bradberry wrote:
I have a file with 3 - 10 position character fields.

FWiW: "Three dash Ten positions character fields" says to me, that there are an unspecified number of "three to ten byte character fields". IMO either giving the DDS-like or SQL DDL would be much clearer. Or perhaps just "three 10-byte character fields". As well, the POSITION parameter deals with Key fields, so beyond just "character fields", they are a set of "character fields that define the composite key" of the file; again, the DDS or DDL would make that obvious.

Having read nearly to the end of the message... the implication is finally more obvious, wherein the file\keys are more clearly defined. Seems that might have better have been the lead-in... yet offering DDS or DDL to describe a file leaves little room for inference about what a description in words may be confusing or lacking. Again... FWiW.

I am building the key string and using it in the OVRDBF statement.
I have 3 variables which I *cat with the quote variable then *Bcat
the three into the FileKey variable.

Unless there is a need to embed an apostrophe [i.e. an apostrophe is part of the key], there is no apparent need to do that.

However to build a command-string that will be sent to a command-processor, rather than performing the command inline to the CLP, then there may be a requirement to preface and suffix the data with an apostrophe to make the character data appear as a delimited string by the command interpreter. However there should be no need to issue the Override with Database File (OVRDBF) using the Execute Command API (QCMDEXC) nor any other similar API [e.g. QCAPCMD]. In fact doing so is potentially problematic, *if* there is any value which includes an apostrophe, because then the request will have an unmatched apostrophe unless either the request is formed in hexadecimal or the existing apostrophes are doubled; i.e. escaped with a preceding apostrophe.

DCL &QUOTE *CHAR 1 VALUE('''')
Dcl &FileKey Type(*Char) Len(38)

The following declarations and the assignments [with values reflecting the apparent intent for a 30-byte composite key buffer] should enable an easy way to have the &FileKey variable function as expected for the OVRDBF that follows [from the quoted message]:

dcl &key10Ausr *char 10 stg(*defined) defvar(&FileKey 01) /* 01-10 */
dcl &key10Alib *char 10 stg(*defined) defvar(&FileKey 11) /* 11-20 */
dcl &key10Apgm *char 10 stg(*defined) defvar(&FileKey 21) /* 21-30 */
dcl &keyExtra *char 01 stg(*defined) defvar(&FileKey 31) /* 31-31 */
/* the &FileKey could reduce to 31 bytes */

chgvar &key10Ausr 'USER' /* right-pad implicit; this and next 2 */
chgvar &key10Alib 'XXXLIB'
chgvar &key10Apgm 'XXX001C'
chgvar &keyExtra 'X' /* non-blank; required: keep blank pad */

OvrDbF PGMSEC Position(*Key 3 *N &FileKey)
RcvF RcdFmt(@PGMSEC)

From the Job Log:

4500 - OVRDBF FILE(PGMSEC) POSITION(*KEY 3 *N '''USER '' ''XXXLIB '' ''XXX001C ''')
4600 - RCVF DEV(*FILE) RCDFMT(@PGMSEC) WAIT(*YES) OPNID(*NONE)
/* File name is xxxLIB/PGMSEC. */
Position option for member PGMSEC not valid.
Function check. CPF4137 unmonitored by CKD001C at statement 0000004600,
instruction X'0000'.
CPF4137 received by procedure CKD001C. (C D I R)

The effective joblog [formatted\wrapped to show layout; a scale line showing positions of each key value] after having made the above changes in declares and run-time, to assign values to the 30-byte key with a non-blank 31st byte:

- OVRDBF FILE(PGMSEC)
POSITION(*KEY 3 *N 'USER XXXLIB XXX001C X')
/* ...scale line..: ....+....1....+....2....+....3. */


<<SNIP>>
Message ID . . . . . . . . . : CPF4137
<<SNIP>>
Message . . . . : Position option for member &4 not valid.
Cause . . . . . : The position option for member &4 file &2 in
library &3 is not valid. The conditions that can cause this
error include:
-- The relative record number or key specified with the OVRDBF
command does not exist in the file.
<<SNIP>>
Recovery . . . : Do one of the following and try your
request again:
-- Use the OVRDBF command to specify a record that exists in
member &4.

Presumably the following 38-byte string value [minus the double-quotes as delimiters, is not found in the file, just as the message alludes in the first cause and recovery:
"'USER ' 'XXXLIB ' 'XXX001C '"
"....+....1....+....2....+....3....+....+"

Of course, necessarily truncated to the 30-byte key length, that value is also unlikely to be in the file; most notably, due to the embedded apostrophes:
"'USER ' 'XXXLIB ' 'XXX"
"....+....1....+....2....+....3"

I see the multiple quotes around the 3 components of the key, but I
can't see how to make them go away.

Do not add the apostrophes :-) Just use *CAT, no *BCAT, and no &QUOTE; e.g. something like the following, although the *DEFINED storage example declarations and assignments are better IMO:

chgvar &FileKey (&c10_usr *cat &c10_lib *cat &c10_pgm)

My file is keyed on the three fields, User, Library, Program in that
order. There is a record in the file for the above
user/library/program combination.

Given all of the key fields represent apparent object names according to system-naming rules [in the /QSYS.LIB file system], an apostrophe is not easily [allowed to be] embedded in an object name [via a command interface]; i.e. it is probably safe to _assume_ that will not be an issue.

However if any of the key fields were Packed Decimal, integer, or any /character/ field that allows either unprintable characters or embedded apostrophes [e.g. names like O'Neil], then the key value should be coded as a hex string in the form X'hexadecimal_digits' or if all are just character fields whereby any might contain embedded apostrophes, then another option is to escape the apostrophes, whenever passing a command-string to a command processor. Failing to escape the apostrophes in the data or to code the string as a hexadecimal string when the x'7D' as apostrophe appears in the data, could result in CPD0014 "A matching apostrophe not found." and CPF0006 "Errors occurred in command." when the command interpreter is invoked;;; and horribly, it could work in all testing and most of the time, and only fail when something in the data finally has an apostrophe or x'7D' :-(

I am having a senior Friday moment. Can someone please point me at
the explanation ?

I realize a followup post implies the problem was resolved, apparently calling QCMDEXC. But hopefully some of the above comments are worthwhile... if not, perhaps to someone perusing the archives.

I suggest avoiding the CALL to QCMDEXC, and just correcting the 4th element of the POSITION() parameter to use the 31-byte string with the 31st character set to a non-blank [e.g. 'X'].


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.