I'm dismayed, but not surprised, to hear of SYSDUMMY1 being treated in this fashion by IBM...which begs the question...
What is "best practice" concerning the use of SYSDUMMY1? It's quite useful in duplicating the SETLL/SETGT op-code in RPG and it is used frequently in our code for this reason.
This communication, including attachments, is confidential, may be subject to legal privileges, and is intended for the sole use of the addressee. Any use, duplication, disclosure or dissemination of this communication, other than by the addressee, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or destroy this communication and all copies.