×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
FWIW - Wanted to add a comment on the CL to CLLE thing.
I do a lot of work with PASE and cannot count the number of hours that I have burned trying to troubleshoot an issue with a program that was originally compiled as CLLE and then simply recompiled back to OPM CL and it worked fine.
Now to be fair I do a lot of calling to Qshell and Pase code within my CL's, but personally I have gone back to wrapping anything that calls PASE or Java via Qshell as a regular CLP.
Along the line of service programs, as Vern mentioned re-usability of common code is the best reason for a service program.
I wouldn't expect anyone to re-engineer an old system just to add service programs to their code, but if you have any app modernization on your career roadmap, it's better to start using new technologies. Employers look for those things on a resume and expect you to know the new stuff.
Regards,
Richard Schoen
RJS Software Systems Inc.
Where Information Meets Innovation
Document Management, Workflow, Report Delivery, Forms and Business Intelligence
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web Site:
http://www.rjssoftware.com
Tel: (952) 736-5800
Fax: (952) 736-5801
Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT
-----Original Message-----
Another one? Just compiling CL programs as ILE gives you a great
performance boost with almost no effort - great ROI. Why NOT take the
low-hanging fruit?
Others will have more to add.
<not-letting-you-know-this-is-vern>
midrange.com
