lol...dang read that too fast...
I should have known better than to try to correct you.
Charles
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:43 PM, CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 31 Jan 2013 09:10, Charles Wilt wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 7:42 PM, CRPence wrote:
This method is also very simple, very uniform to prevent a
/random/ occurrence of auditing more than two cases consecutively,
Not quite....you could end up auditing case #10 out of group A and
case # 1 out of group B...
Ie. case #10 and #11...
But that's "random" for 'ya. :)
But of course case #10 followed by case #11 is not "more than two
cases consecutively", it is merely "two cases consecutively" :-)
--
Regards, Chuck
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
