MIDRANGE-L » January 2013

Re: Multi volume restore

Subject: Re: Multi volume restore
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:55:34 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Not a bad idea. It's just that transition time that makes it tight.
Like that whacked out idea of using virtual tape. At least whacked in my
case. Tying up a TB on both lpars (for a total of 2TB) for the virtual
tape eats some serious disk. That and the 25 hour ftp time...

Rob Berendt

This thread ...

Re: Multi volume restore, (continued)

References:
- Multi volume restore , rob
- Re: Multi volume restore , rob
- Re: Multi volume restore , Evan Harris
- Re: Multi volume restore , rob
- Re: Multi volume restore , rob
- Re: Multi volume restore , DrFranken

Prev by Author: Re: loopback or loopback which will connect?
Next by Author: Re: COMMON Virtual Conference
Previous by thread: Re: Multi volume restore
Next by thread: Re: Multi volume restore
Index(es):

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2013 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact