MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » MIDRANGE-L » January 2013

RE: Issue with embedded lists in a command



fixed

You're probably right. I'm working from memory on this and it has been a long time. I looked at some of my commands and I've always put all the parms at the top above all the labelled groups. I learned this a long, long time ago; parser rules change over time.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vernon Hamberg
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 12:18 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Issue with embedded lists in a command

Hi Dan

IIRC, you CAN put ELEM groups and QUAL groups anywhere - they are labeled, so it doesn't matter - seems I did that for some commands at RJS, as a kind of self-documentation.

Of course, I have been wrong a couple times this year, and it's only the 2nd week!

Vern

On 1/9/2013 11:59 AM, Dan Kimmel wrote:
Rick,

Your code is arranged incorrectly. First the CMD keyword statement, then all the PARM keyword statements, then the tagged groups of ELEM or QUAL or whatever referenced in your TYPE's.


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 10:40 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Issue with embedded lists in a command

I am working on a command that I want to have a list as one of the parameters but I also want the parameter to contain a list as one of the elements.

I have a code value as the first parameter. For that code value there are four pieces of information; the code itself, a start date, an end date, and message information. The message information is itself a list made up of the message text, configuration text, and size text. So far so good.

Where the issue comes in is when I define the code and message as lists. There can be up to two codes and there could be up to three message lines for each code. When I specify the code with a max value of two (MAX(2)) and the message with a max value of three (MAX(3)) the command will not compile and I get the error shown here. Displaying second level text didn't tell me anything I didn't already know.

CPD0258 30 More than three levels of nesting specified for keyword ENRCODE.

I have posted the code here http://code.midrange.com/bf8f32f019.html.

I am not seeing where the three levels are. It looks to me like just two; the ENRCODE PARM line, and the ELEM line with ENRMSG. Can someone help me out with what I'm missing?

Rick Chevalier
Software Solutions Development Lead
[cid:image001.gif@01CDEE54.33DB8360]
817-525-7178 (w)


________________________________
Privileged and Confidential. This e-mail, and any attachments there to, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me immediately by a return e-mail and delete this e-mail. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and/or any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.








Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact