I don't argue with the importance of the topic or the passions
surrounding it, but as Rob pointed out this is a technical forum, so
this should be carried over to CPF0000.
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects
On 12/12/2012 12:56 PM, Trevor Perry wrote:
Actually, if you had been reading what I had been reading, there was a lot
of different subjects all inside the same topic thread. Seems that if
something promotes this kind of discussion, it is important. Calling it a
pulp does not make it so.
I find that any time this conversation arises, one or two more people
learn and understand what IBM i truly is. Surely it is worth a little
effort to promote and support the platform. Giving up when the going gets
tough does not solve the problem, it just means it will happen again.
Which, on most forums, is the case. If you want something to happen, stand
up for it. You will have to put up with the pushback from those who resist
change, but don't ust run away when it gets tough.
On 12/12/12 1:45 PM, "Jim Oberholtzer"<midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>This ones been beaten to a pulp. Time to call it quits and go another