The OP should use Visual Explain to see just what is happening - it
would tell them which engine is in use. And a whole bunch of other
information, very useful stuff.
It might be helpful for us to see more detail - DSPFD of the SO logical,
original table, the actual statement - have we seen those yet from the OP?
But if they think it's a bug, it's time to call IBM again.
On 11/5/2012 4:01 PM, CRPence wrote:
On 05 Nov 2012 13:59, Charles Wilt wrote:
The only reason the QE would use a select/omit logical is that it
That QAQQINI Query Option Parameter, whether or not to ignore Derived
was specified in the query or when IGNORE_DERIVED_INDEX=*NO and
the select/omit criteria matched the WHERE clause of the query.
Indexes, applies only to SQE processing. Thus another possibility
explaining the choice of the derived access path, is that the query is
being processed by the CQE. Any query implemented via the CQE could use
any S\O LF over the data, irrespective of the value\specification for
that INI option. My reply does not intend to imply any relevance for
the query described by the OP.