× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi, Charles

I think it's a bug because all tables in the SQL statement are qualified.

I've also checked the query options file used and it specifically states IGNORE_DERIVED_INDEX value = '*YES'.

This is a really simple left outer join of the data table to the two master tables with key values so it should be rather transparent. On further review, the LF that the optimizer is selecting has a data table with almost 2 million rows (!) joined to the master file that I need (which has 296 rows) and one additional master table that is ancillary to the first master table. It just doesn't make sense.

I've opened a PMR with IBM. I'll report back the results if/when we get it worked out.

Robert


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.