Why would IBM include MF99005 on a cume package (2279) but not include the
rest of SF99707? But not including the rest is what IBM did. I am
looking at the cover letter for SF99707 at
and I can see MF55945 is on SF99707 but is not currently on any cume. I
could see that on other group PTF's that get updated on a different
schedule but every PTF listed in SF99707 has the same date as MF99005 (or

Rob Berendt

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2015 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact