Aaron Bartell wrote:
I am putting together a form of research initiative that aims to quantify
*why* a non-IBMi tech person should consider or pursue IBMi.

Given that IBM has been steadily abandoning everything about the platform that differentiates it from other platforms (little things like 5250 data stream and Twinax, as well as big things like native record-level access, its close integration with RPG, and The RPG Cycle), and also given as how the latest versions of the OS are always putting up insulting, patronizing messages in the faces of those still using terminals and emulators instead of iNav, are there any reasons left?

I mean, other than, "It's not a Unix-type system, and therefore isn't constantly giving you enough rope to hang yourself (and helping you tie the knot)" and "It's not WinDoze, and therefore doesn't have security holes big enough to drive an aircraft carrier through"?


Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2015 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact