× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



George wrote:
What I'm wondering is if there is a signifigant performance advantage
(or penalty) to ordering them according to their variability. In other
words, given a situation where you have a lot#, case#, piece# with many
pieces# per case, per lot, would a key order of (lot, case, piece)
affect performance differently than (piece, case, lot)?


My understanding is the most frequently uses fields should appear before
any others in the key list.

The idea is that row selection, think SQL WHERE clause, is a main factor
in access path selection;
therefore those fields more frequently used as WHERE criteria should
appear before others.

I do think there is a general recommendation for fewer access paths that
are "wider" as
opposed to many "narrow" access paths.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.