× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Booth Martin wrote:
Lets say you have 10,000 items, and these items are spread evenly across:
- 4 colors
- 12 sizes
- 40 package possibilities
- and 500 patterns

The most efficient search is to do the most restrictive choice first.

If you choose a specific pattern first then you have immediately narrowed your search to 10,000/500, or only 20 items left to choose from.

If you selected color first, you would only narrow your choices to 10,000/4, or 2,500 left to narrow down.

Hmm. I haven't been following the thread, but one thing occurs to me immediately:

Let's assume the given example is some consumer product. The potential customer might conceivably want to browse through all the available patterns for one or more specific combinations of color, size, and package-type. Which would suggest it might be wise to provide multiple indexes to the file.

--
James H. H. Lampert
Professional Dilettante
http://www.hbquik.com/jamesl

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.