× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



However, more and more we are going to be running up against other languages, like SQL, that handle NULL in a predictable defined manner. When moving outside RPG, use of NULL is common. So it is my contention that we should learn the proper use of NULL rather than just dismissing it because it is unfamiliar.

Mark Murphy
STAR BASE Consulting, Inc.
mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



-----midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----


To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 08/18/2010 10:35AM
Subject: Re: Sql Question

John,

I agree, you shouldn't make a column NULL-able unless there's a
specific reason you need the NULL-able.

Charles


On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM, John Arnold (MFS)
<jarnold@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The nature of null values is that they can only be found by a test for
null values - they will never show up in a not equal test - if you have
null values in your data you must test for values not equal and values
are null.

This is why my data base does not allow null values unless there is a
good reason for something to contain null values.



-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Campin
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 6:08 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Sql Question

I have an SQL statement that compares data in for one table in two
different
libraries. The SQL just says report any record where the initials are
different but when I run it I get nothing.

I had one record where the initials for in one record was Null and in
the
other FUL but the SQL reported them as equal. That doesn't make much
sense.

Does SQL bypass the test if one side is null? Isn't null just a absence
of
data so they would not be equal? Have I found a bug (A big one?
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.