× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



You don't need to worry about multiple controllers as the M25 is a power6
processor, and it can do virtual LPARS. This means, that an IBM I partition
on 6.1 or later can host another IBM I partition at 6.1 or later. It's
extremely simple to do ( I gave a presentation on this earlier this week at
COMMON Europe) and the only thing you need is an HMC if you have a Power6 or
Power7 machine, and both your hosting and hosted partitions can be either
6.1.x or 7.1. I have been building these for my customers now for the past
year and they work great.

Pete

--
Pete Massiello
iTech Solutions
http://www.itechsol.com

Add iTech Solutions on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126431824120
Add iTech Solutions on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2206093

iTech Solutions because IBM i (AS/400s) didn't come with System
Administrators



-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neeraj J
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 4:36 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: LPAR for testing on a relatively small machine?

Are those 12 disk on same controller or different ?

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Lennon_s_j@xxxxxxxxxxx <
lennon_s_j@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Can we create an LPAR for testing on a relatively small machine? Any
thoughts from hardware experts would be appreciated, before we starting
digging into the manuals...

Here's the picture:

We have a 520 M25 running V6R1, 1 processor, 16GB memory with plenty of
spare CPU time.

We have 12 4328 disk units at Raid 5. 8 are 120mb, 4 are 100mb, for
over 1 TB of space. We could devote 25% of this to a test LPAR.

I believe we could share the CPU so that the existing production
partition would rarely be impacted (it would always get priority for
cycles).

But can we realistically split up 12 drives so that 25% goes to a new
LPAR? For continued production performance I think we'd want production
data spread across all 12 units.

Back in a former life on an earlier OS with much bigger machines, IIRC
we needed a separate disk controller for each LPAR, but I was much
further removed from hardware nuances then. (I'm still not all that
close...)

Thanks, Sam

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.