× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Got it, there is no CFINIT being enabled. Currently, it is a soft error
with just a warning. I would imagine at some time in the future, IBM might
start to enforce that, but that is truly my opinion and not IBM's stated
direction. So, there is no need to worry that the system is reallocating
licenses when you do this. How many licenses of i5/OS do you have (1,2,4)?

As for your question on resources being allocated. From a performance
standpoint, you would want to look at memory and CPU. What are you doing
with your machine? Are you using capped or uncapped? Do you have your
virtual processors set up correctly? Is all your memory allocated to your
partitions?

Pete

Pete Massiello
iTech Solutions
http://www.itechsol.com

Add iTech Solutions on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126431824120
Add iTech Solutions on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2206093





-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jonathan Mason
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:07 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: CPF9E7F "usage limit exceeded" and performance

Hi Pete

Thanks for that. I realise it's a licensing issue, my question could
probably have been worded better. Other than knowing how to spell LPAR
I don't have a lot of knowledge on the ins-and-outs and allocation of
resources across it.

What I'm wondering is if, given the situation that causes the message to
be sent, the system would do anything to try and rectify the situation
and reallocate licensed CPU elsewhere.

For example if the limit across all partitions is 25 would it allow the
26th to be used indefinitely or prevent it from being used. Or
alternatively does anything akin to the old CFINT (I think it was
called) process kick in to limit the performance of the machine until
the licensing issue is resolved.

All the best

Jonathan




Pete Massiello <pmassiello-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote :

This is a licensing issue and not a performance message.

Pete

Pete Massiello
iTech Solutions
http://www.itechsol.com

Add iTech Solutions on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=126431824120
Add iTech Solutions on LinkedIn:





-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jonathan Mason
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 6:44 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: CPF9E7F "usage limit exceeded" and performance

http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2206093 This probably sounds like a
silly question, but would the generation of message "CPF9E7F i5/OS
also result in users experiencing severe response issues?

The message has the following details:

Message . . . . : i5/OS usage limit exceeded - operator action
required.
Cause . . . . . : The processor usage limit of 25 processors for
product
5722SS1, license term V5, feature 5051 has been exceeded.
-- Current processor usage across all active i5/OS partitions is
26.00.
-- Current processor usage for the local partition is 18.00.

A performance issue was noted yesterday and this message was found in
QHST at around the same time so I'm just wondering if it's relevant.

Thanks

Jonathan


Jonathan Mason
iSeries Consultant
www.astradyne-uk.com


_______________________________________________________
This message was sent using NOCC v1.14 webmail software
_______________________________________________________




--
usage limit exceeded - operator action required" This is the Midrange
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



--
Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list This is the
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.





Jonathan Mason
iSeries Consultant
www.astradyne-uk.com


_______________________________________________________
This message was sent using NOCC v1.14 webmail software
_______________________________________________________





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.