|
I ordered the latest Cume for V5R4, which contained fifteen [15]images. I
did the ADDIMGCLGE in the order of the images, such as SF99540_1.binfirst
and SF99540_15.bin last. I, also, downloaded some other groups andadded
these after the Cume.VFYIMGCLG of
Next I ran the CPYPTFCVR procedure, which automatically does a
Type(*PTF).process is
Using the WRKIMGCLG I see that the order of the images is:
SF99540_11
SF99540_12
SP99540_13
SF99540_14
SF99540_15
SF99114_1 (through _8)
SP99540_1 (through _10)
I "think" that I recall from a COMMON session that the PTF apply
smart enough (somehow) to put the PTFs in the proper order. If Iremembered
that correctly, the order of the images shouldn't matter.so it
But did I get it right?
Reordering the images probably wouldn't do a bit of good because, when
using image catalogues, the PTF process does a verify again, anyway,
would probably just sort 'em back to the sequence above.list
Jerry C. Adams
IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
--
B&W Wholesale
office: 615-995-7024
email: jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx--
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.