Jerry,
You could run a VFYIMGCLG and specify SORT(*YES)...
Happy New Year!!
Luis Rodriguez
IBM Certified Systems Expert — eServer i5 iSeries
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Jerry Adams <jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I ordered the latest Cume for V5R4, which contained fifteen [15] images. I
did the ADDIMGCLGE in the order of the images, such as SF99540_1.bin first
and SF99540_15.bin last. I, also, downloaded some other groups and added
these after the Cume.
Next I ran the CPYPTFCVR procedure, which automatically does a VFYIMGCLG of
Type(*PTF).
Using the WRKIMGCLG I see that the order of the images is:
SF99540_11
SF99540_12
SP99540_13
SF99540_14
SF99540_15
SF99114_1 (through _8)
SP99540_1 (through _10)
I "think" that I recall from a COMMON session that the PTF apply process is
smart enough (somehow) to put the PTFs in the proper order. If I remembered
that correctly, the order of the images shouldn't matter.
But did I get it right?
Reordering the images probably wouldn't do a bit of good because, when
using image catalogues, the PTF process does a verify again, anyway, so it
would probably just sort 'em back to the sequence above.
Jerry C. Adams
IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
--
B&W Wholesale
office: 615-995-7024
email: jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
