× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. June 2009

RE: Cumulative PTFs in 2010

I wasn't doing PTF's and Cume's in 2000, so what did IBM doe then? Or was it an entirely different scenario?

Jerry C. Adams
IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
--
B&W Wholesale
office: 615-995-7024
email: jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vern Hamberg
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 8:18 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Cumulative PTFs in 2010

How about Axxx? Then the problem is put off for 6 years!!

Vern

Justin C. Haase wrote:
Any bets on what the identifiers will change to? Will it be 0xxx, or
will they add a fifth digit and make it 10xxx? Will the system be
smart enough to realize that a cumulative level of 0xxx is higher than
9xxx? Will there be a PTF which requires IPL prior to spin of the
first 2010 cumulative package?

These are the things I think about. Happy Monday.

Justin


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.