Mike,
I have customers on V5R3 that are using uncapped partitions. This
has more to do with the box being a Power5 (min) than anything else.
Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Crump, Mike
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 11:14 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: LPAR - HMC/FSP vs. R/LPAR vs. APRM vs. ?
Pete,
That is the path I've been leaning towards. Does that require V5r4? I
still have partitions of V5R3 (ducking). But they should be on V5R4
soon.
Michael Crump
Manager, Computing Services
Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.
1509 S. Macedonia Ave.
Muncie, IN 47302
765.741.7696
765.741.7012 f
Motivation
If a pretty poster and a cute saying are all it takes to motivate you,
you probably have a very easy job. The kind robots will be doing soon.
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pete Massiello
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 10:17 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: LPAR - HMC/FSP vs. R/LPAR vs. APRM vs. ?
Mike,
For moving processor resources around, I use uncapped and it
works
great. This might be too simplest for your environment, but using
uncapped
for partitions has been so easy to maximize my customer's iSeries
investment
to get the most usage out of the machines CPW. I understand that memory
movement will be forthcoming in the future.
Pete
Pete Massiello
iTech Solutions
http://www.itechsol.com
-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Crump, Mike
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 9:23 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: LPAR - HMC/FSP vs. R/LPAR vs. APRM vs. ?
I wanted to get some feedback on what people are using for their LPAR
environments for control purposes.
When we first started doing LPAR's we used R/LPAR mostly to move IOP
resources around. With memory and processor we operated pretty much in
a capped/static environment. Due to price increases with their products
I had to choose Help Systems products to surrender in order to keep my
Help Systems maintenance fees from skyrocketing. I chose R/LPAR because
it was one of the more costly products, we were using the least, and one
that we could actually function without.
I'm now moving into the world where I need to move processor and memory
and not be so static. I should have some environments where I have
higher demand at different times - evening vs. day.
Honestly, I don't think I can afford R/LPAR and there upgrade costs
can't be ignored. I thought I would check with people and see what they
were using and their opinions. I also wanted to get input on 3rd party
pricing practices. I can't afford to buy a product and pay increased
license fees and maintenance fees every time I upgrade. If the price
changes aren't very large I can probably get it approved but when those
costs go up 25% - 50% and the only thing I'm doing different is running
on a larger processor - I can't get it approved.
Now, I'm mo
Michael Crump
Manager, Computing Services
Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.
1509 S. Macedonia Ave.
Muncie, IN 47302
765.741.7696
765.741.7012 f
Destiny
You were meant for me. Perhaps as punishment.
This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view
or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
neccesarily represent those of Saint-Gobain. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email and its attachments, you must take no
action based upon them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone.
Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in
error.
midrange.com
