MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » MIDRANGE-L » November 2008

RE: QNTC and Windows 2008 Server



fixed

That's what I thought at first, I assumed the resolution was a problem, but it
works for our other servers using their names. I tried creating a QNTC link
using the IP address and we get the same result, nothing comes in.

I found a QNTC document on IBM's site that referred to an error CPDB050:
Technical description . . . . . . . . : An error code 109 was received while
trying to initialize a session to the Network Server SERVER2.

The document says: 109 error - Name found, session rejected

So its finding the system, its just getting rejected from a connection attempt.
Something must be set on the Win2k8 system to block whatever type of connection
the AS400 is making, I just can't figure out where.


Leonard Burns IV

DRV Technologies
Phone: 866-378-3366
Fax: 678-418-1501
www.drvtech.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Lukas Beeler [mailto:lukas.beeler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 3:05
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: QNTC and Windows 2008 Server

On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 20:40, Leonard Burns IV <leonard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
on a Windows 2008 Standard server? I have Wireshark loaded and I'm watching
the
packets come in and I'm not even seeing an SMB attempt,

Looks like name resolution doesn't work. How are you trying to resolve
the hostname?

WINS? Netbios Broadcasts? DNS? For example, depending upon
configuration, WS08 or Vista might not respond to Netbios Broadcasts.

You can try to use the IP Adress directly, to see if this is the case.






Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact