|
You can't really seriously be saying to change every line of code, or
internal names, that use an old convention? Really? There is a history,
and it is not reasonable to throw it all away. Just how many bugs do you
want to introduce into the system? Good money thrown at bad ideas, IMHO.
Where is the ROI?
I guess I'm coming to a place of recognizing that not all references
will be changed, and that I should direct my issues thereto to IBM, not
here in this all too public forum.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.