× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.




Now THIS post makes some sense.




Jon Paris
<Jon.Paris@Partne
r400.com> To
Sent by: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
midrange-l-bounce cc
s@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
Re: More IBM Firings
11/12/2008 05:29
PM


Please respond to
Midrange Systems
Technical
Discussion
<midrange-l@midra
nge.com>







On 12-Nov-08, at 2:04 PM, midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Ross Mauri's recent letter included a very unfortunate word in
describing "i". He called it "strategic". Today being November 11th
I hope you all remember your history lessons, including what that
designation means to IBM products and initiatives.

Neil - you have it all backwards. I agree it is an unfortunate word
to have applied to the i but not for the reason you state.

"strategic" in IBM terms means that vast amounts of money and resource
will be spent on it (and here's the important unwritten bit)
regardless of whether it is a good idea or not and whether anyone
needs it or not. That's why when some new "strategy" comes along,
everyone and his brother frantically tries to make their product fit
the mold. The current buzz would be SOA, but in the past AD/Cycle was
strategic, SAA was strategic, VisualAge xxx was strategic, OS/2 was
strategic. WebSphere may be one of the few strategic things to meet
with any real success.

"strategic" products tend to get buried under their own hype and the
number of truly idiotic hanger-on products that leap on the
bandwagon. Some like AD/Cycle and SAA were good ideas in many ways,
but ahead of their time and the technology curve - and IBM got "bored"
with them long before the market was ready. But hey! we got RPG IV out
of SAA so it wasn't all bad!

On-going success stories that were never really strategic (and hence
successful) would be things like CICS and MQ Series.

Question is are we going to see the massive investment that
"strategic" products normally attract.


Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.