RE: CPF427F - Estimated Query Processing Time Exceeds Limit -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Using OpsNav is not something I do very often - very slow via my vpn and
my satellite connection. What option would I use 'grab' it?

I see something SQL Performance monitors under databases - is that it?

Bonnie Lokenvitz
Office: 320.679.2599
Fax: 320.679.8202

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 9:21 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: CPF427F - Estimated Query Processing Time Exceeds Limit

Bonnie,

We'd need to see the SQL statement to know what's going on. Is the
problem repeatable? If so, just grab it from OpsNav. Two things are
possible (well, many are possible, two are likely) first, the user put
in dumb selection criteria and the query governor saved you from a
disaster. Or, when they upgraded the ERP system they trashed (or the
upgrade process trashed) an index they'd created to enable these queries
to run quickly. The # of rows in a table doesn't really feed into query
processing time unless you're missing indicies.

-Walden

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.