× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Pete

Once you get used to a HMC you will never want to give away the
functionality it offers. I'd also be willing to say it was as bullet proof
as twinax - which I wouldn't say about either LAN or Direct attach console.

I have one customer that installed it using an existing KVM they had. While
I find it awkward and a pain to use this way it works fine (though it would
not be my preference).

The only thing it doesn't do is change tapes and CD's.

If you are seriously investigating this on your customers behalf, get a
decent look at one and get a reasonable trial. The extra money is well
spent.

Regards
Evan Harris

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pete Helgren
Sent: Friday, 13 July 2007 5:59 a.m.
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Console replacement strategy

I have a customer that had a 5250 twinax console which about a year ago
we replaced. They wanted something that was "more modern". After doing
some research I settled on a unit by Visara which we installed at the
customer. At this point, a year later, we are again looking at
something to replace the console (the Visara unit - don't ask). I have
followed various threads over the past year about thin consoles and,
more recently, an HMC. I'd like some feedback on what the best approach
would be to make this a closely bullet-proof as the good 'ol twinax
terminal was.

The requirements are: This will be on a KVM. The console must be VERY
simple to use: diagnostics, rebooting (if needed), starting the 5250
session (if needed) need to be so simple a child could do it. The
keyboard layout should be such that it make it easy for them to
transition between PC sessions and 5250 console. I am leaning toward
handling a remote access requirement by getting an IP based KVM that I
can use to get to them over the Internet with since there is an IXA and
an IXS on this 520 that I would like to access as well.

Any opinions on what the best overall solution would be?

Pete

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.