× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Booth, this was the approach I came up with, and I think is the best.
However, the biggest problem in all this, is the SOX requirements of getting
it tested and validated by all the groups and locations. When mods like this
are rolled into TEST, they tend to ignore them if they don't affect them
personally. And, so the work would sit there until the original requestor
pushed and made everybody else do the testing and signoff.


On 3/2/07, Booth Martin <booth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'd have two thoughts Ron.

The first is this:  I believe in the iceberg theory of problems.  For
every user problem that you see there are 9 more just like it lurking
under the surface.

Second thought:  Would it be useful to have an "Orders Group" to which
qualified users could be added?  The quantity fields could be protected
for all users, excepting those in the "Orders Group"?   Be sure your
offending user does not get added to the "Orders Group."   I have an
idea that  this might harvest some unseen rewards.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.