|
That doesn't sound correct. Cpyfrmqryf needs a open data path to copy from. Job logs are not real clear when checking on opnqryf. That's a really large file to be using opnqryf against. That job must run for a while ? Wouldn't a logical make more sense ? Is the job doing record selection or just using opnqryf to sort the file ? You could actually end up with "2" files of 25mb using this method. Douglas Palme wrote:
We are running a CL in batch that is opening a query file over a PF with approx 25m records, the next line of code is CPYFRMQRYF.
In checking the job log it appears that BOTH are running simultaneously.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.