× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I am not the one running it, I would have not used opnqryf myself and yes it
does take a while to run (about 4 hours).

I was trying to figure out why they were running at the same time.


-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pat Barber
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 9:03 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Is this unusual? OPNQRYF | CPYFRMQRYF

That doesn't sound correct. Cpyfrmqryf needs a open
data path to copy from. Job logs are not real clear
when checking on opnqryf.

That's a really large file to be using opnqryf against.
That job must run for a while ? Wouldn't a logical
make more sense ? Is the job doing record selection or
just using opnqryf to sort the file ?

You could actually end up with "2" files of 25mb using
this method.


Douglas Palme wrote:

We are running a CL in batch that is opening a query file over a PF with
approx 25m records, the next line of code is CPYFRMQRYF.

In checking the job log it appears that BOTH are running simultaneously.  


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.