|
well, yes, but SQL is a "set at a time" operation. You are asking to update a set of records from another set of records... so... SQL asks the question... "what happens to the set update if b.mtordn changes during the update operation?" click... lock. On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 12:39 -0600, Turnidge, Dave wrote:
I have a fellow programmer who has this code in a CL program: Update OEP013W a set a.wkclosr = (select mtclon from OETITLP b where a.wkorder = b.mtordn) where a.wkclosr = 0 Where OEP013W is a work file in QTEMP; OETITLP is a production PF. If someone is in the record (locking it) this statement fails. If you do the sub-SELECT statement by itself with someone locking the record, it doesn't fail. Does a SELECT in an UPDATE statement have different rules? It was our understanding that a SELECT did not lock, or require a lock, and we assumed would not be inhibited by someone else locking a record in that file. TIA Dave
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.