|
On 9/6/06, rob@xxxxxxxxx <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If it takes that much horsepower to perform that task, then why perform the task in the first place? Instead, just keep the indexes. Or, again, was it just an attempt to get in a dig? If so, when you reach that desperately you end up shooting your argument in the foot.
as one of those #@% top posters I dont know what task you are referring to. ( use gmail for these "discussions". makes it easy to reply in context. ) It is very doable for the system to retain an index and then discard it at some later time after it has not been used for a while. Just keep the xx most recently used temporary indexes and delete the rest. IBMers are far from dumb. What they dont have on a fractional core i520 is the CPU to support such a feature. -Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
