RE: RE: Daylight Saving Time

Just to clarify and make certain I don't misunderstand, I would expect that a 
job scheduled for 2:30AM would run as soon after 3:00AM as CPU cycles would 
allow for the job scheduler. (Though Rob said 1:30 AM, I'd guess he meant 
2:30AM.)

That is, the scheduler wouldn't necessarily be running a job exactly, precisely 
at a given time. More likely, it would run the job starting at the time the 
signal arrived that indicated a scheduled time had passed. For 2:30AM on the 
morning of a time change from 2:00AM to 3:00AM, that signal _ought_ to be 
generated at 3:00AM. (Or 3:00:00.000001AM or whatever.)

Make sense? It would depend on how the signal was generated (whatever the 
"signal" is).

Tom Liotta

midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>   8. RE: Daylight Saving Time (Bruce Vining)
>
>
>Yes the job would run.
>
>Bruce Vining
>
>             rob
>                                       RE: Daylight Saving Time           >
>Good news on the job scheduler not running the 1:30am job twice in the
>fall, when you have two 1:30am's in one night.
>Will it run it at all in the spring when you have no 1:30am?
>
>Rob Berendt