|
Shannon, Take one step back on the holier than thou attitude there Doug. Not all of > us have gone to V5R3 yet and have therefore had any need to read the memo to > users for that release yet. But then you haven't been affected by the change either. The change is part of the release planning, as is reading the memo. My main point was that IBM didn't just arbitrarily decide to no longer worry about maintaining backward compatibility on APIs, as the start of the thread could lead one to believe. But even if you hadn't read the Memo to Users yet, your comment was 16 hours after Scott's explanation of why the change needed to be made, so I assume you had received that post as well. Maybe I read too much into your "That sucks." -- I agree it is unfortunate, but also think that under the circumstances it was a reasonable solution. Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.