|
Hi Kirk, I looked at the Xerox web site (driver download section) and found the following comment included with the PCL driver for Windows operating system environments. "Web-based PCL driver installer for the Phaser 8400 color printer. Only install this driver when printing from an application that requires PCL. The PostScript driver is recommended for printing from the majority of applications. Microsoft WHQL certified." During my career I have seen quite a number of printers offering support for multiple printer languages, which have yielded a different hardware performance depending upon the printer language selected. It is possible the slower speed from the iSeries has nothing to do with the iSeries other than sending PCL formatted information instead of PostScript. If you have iSeries Access, you could test this thought in the following fashion. Create a PC5250 printing session that was not using Host Print Transform (uncheck the box Transform Print Data to ASCII on AS/400). The i5 OS or OS/400 EBCDIC data will be transferred natively from the IBM host to the PC running iSeries Access. If you also make sure that you do not select the Use PDT checkbox, iSeries Access will convert your EBCDIC data into a Windows format known as GDI on the PC running iSeries Access. The GDI format is the generic input format required by Windows print drivers. You will then be able to use the Xerox 8400 PostScript print driver for Windows to format the IBM host data and you can see whether the printing is faster. The only limitation to this idea is that it only supports *SCS spool files. It cannot be used with *AFPDS spool files. HTH Best Regards, /Paul -- Paul Tykodi Principal Consultant TCS - Tykodi Consulting Services LLC E-mail: ptykodi@xxxxxxxxxx >date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:46:18 -0800 >from: kirkg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >subject: Printing Speed on an Xerox Phaser 8400 Color > > I have a client with an Xerox Phaser 8400 Color >printer. Using the Support for ASCII Printers page for >Xerox there is no 8400 but there is an 8200. The >client can print but at best gets about 10-12ppm vs >22-24 from a PC. We have tried both RMTOUTQ and PJL >with little to no change in the speed. I'm going to >review system performance including memory etc for >the QSPL sbs. > >Any other ideas why the 400 can't feed data any faster >to this printer? > >Thanks __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.