|
Just want to know if this is "as designed" or... The scenario is: Data libraries have no links to other libraries: the logicals are in the same library the journal and the receivers in the same library the query in the same library and so on. The night backup is done with the system dedicated so no locks on any object. Yesterday I restored a library (saved on Saturday) with the same name and after deleting the original one. The result is that the journal receiver is in "PARTIAL STATUS" and the new one (generated in automatic and without warning) start with a sequence number 1. Nothing terrible but the previous receiver is no longer usable. I read the Backup and recovery guide: The partial status of a journal receiver indicates the following: .... A journal receiver was saved while it was attached to the journal. This means that additional entries may have been recorded in the journal receiver after the save operation occurred. The receiver was later restored, and no complete version is available. .... i'd like to have your opinion if this is an error or just as designed, I mean should I issue a chgjrn on any journal before saving? Thanks Marco __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.