The PC servers, for straight file serving, will be faster. We had files
on NetServer. Then we moved them to ixs cards using basically the same
disk drives. This was faster than native NetServer. These ixs cards only
go down when we tell them to. And even when we do that we get a call from
IBM because the system has reported a hardware failure.
Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com
Glenn Ericson <Glenn-Ericson@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
10/14/2004 01:20 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Midrange-L@Midrange. Com" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Fax to
Subject
Re: Intel Servers On iseries ?
Tim what are you doing on the PC Servers?
iSeries is generally more cost effective, lower down time
At 01:23 PM 10/14/2004, Tim Ellifritz wrote:
>I'm looking at having to upgrade our 270 and also a couple windows pc
>servers. Has anyone done this all on the iseries and found it to be cost
>effective in the long run? Anything to look out for? Standard Gotcha's?
>
>Thanks,
>Tim
>
>--
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
