|
I like ifnull better myself, mainly 'cause I always have to look up how to spell coalesce. <grin> But I think the SQL standard is coalesce :-( What weird font? My posts look ok when they come back to me, and in the archive. David has mentioned that my posts come through as ISO-"something" Japanese. Which is due to the fact the way our mail servers are configured to support Japanese and English from what our PC people tell me. Charles > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Bale [mailto:dbale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 1:46 PM > To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion > Subject: RE: Left join question (was: SQL table joins: Join vs. Where) > > > > Sure do. It's just that the coalesce post had an example and > the ifnull > didn't, so I tried the coalesce without looking that up in > the ref and it > worked, so... > > But now that you've clued me in, I think I like ifnull > better. I had to > look up a definition of coalesce, and it doesn't seem to match its SQL > function. IfNull reads much better. Is there a preference > for one or the > other in the SQL community? The ref doesn't mention one. > > Thanks Charles! And thanks for dropping that weird font! <g> > > db >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.