× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. May 2004

Re: Virtual Ethernet

I think the linelist option is not important anymore becuase you setup a direct SNA over TCP to two machines using two *ANYNW APPC controllers and some other magic from IBM (machine.network.SNA.IBM.COM and some tie-ing records in a database) this governs the route to the two machines. Your virtual LPAR must always be routed to the controlling LPAR but this is SNA.

We have a SNA over TCPIP setup over the VLAN so i can confirm that it works fine.

Wim

don yattaw wrote:

I have attempted to use AnyNet, but when I do so, it uses the "nonvirtual"
route to get to the other Lpar. Both Lpar's have ethernet cards with
configured tcp interfaces. The AnyNet solution means that I can't
specifiy a linelist for the controller and can't predetermine the route it
will take myself. I haven't actually attempted this for a while, but if
memory serves me (and at times it still does), this was the problem.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.