RE: Record size limitation in RPG - MQ Series

I thought of that.  There are already several utilities out there that IBM 
has renamed to appease those who prefer the IBM commands.  Granted, in 
general I do prefer the IBM naming convention.  However, if a command is 
used across multiple operating systems, then I'll use the standard. 
Examples abound in the TCP/IP according to IBM world
NETSTAT = WRKTCPSTS
NSLOOKUP = STRDNSQRY
PING = VFYTCPCNN

But if this is all it takes to make a customer happy...

By the way, are DSPF/EDTF a pair of those commonly found commands?

Rob Berendt
-- 
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
03/22/2004 02:07 PM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


To
"Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: Record size limitation in RPG - MQ Series






Create a command called DSPUSRSPC. Have it associated with a CL of the
same name. One liner in the CL - DSPF.
 
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 13:59:33 -0500, rob@xxxxxxxxx said:
> I see your point.
> 
> However, what would you expect a 'iseries' based command to give you, to 

> work with a user space, that EDTF/DSPF doesn't?  If it isn't that much 
> more capable, or easier to use, then I just as soon they put the money 
> into something else.
> 
> If IBM created a command, DSPUSRSPC, and it looked pretty much like 
DSPF, 
> would you be happy?
> 
> Rob Berendt
> -- 
> Group Dekko Services, LLC
> Dept 01.073
> PO Box 2000
> Dock 108
> 6928N 400E
> Kendallville, IN 46755
> http://www.dekko.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "jt" <jt@xxxxxx> 
> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 03/22/2004 10:37 AM
> Please respond to
> Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> To
> "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
> 
> Subject
> RE: Record size limitation in RPG - MQ Series
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Iirc, I had a tool to do this and it took relatively "no time" to
> develop.
> IF so, and IF I had access to it, I wouldn't release it to the public
> because the code was crappy, however.
> 
> But what I wonder is how's come IBM hasn't come up with such-a tool all
> these years?!?
> 
> Lemme answer that rhetorical question, Rob.  Because pseudo-dweebs 
prefer
> EDTF and the Kings of the DCRS such as yourself prefer a Windoze-like
> interface as opposed to CmdLine tools.  That's why.
> 
> And it's also because there are, according to Mr. Zollar, there are
> 3,000,000 Java programmers and 300,000 RPG programmers.  So,
> over-applying
> the 80/20 rule, the 300,000 RPGers get essentially zero development 
> dollars,
> and they're just expected to eat dung like they have been for the past
> decade or two.
> 
> Is there something here you don't comprehend, Rob?
> 
> 
> | -----Original Message-----
> | [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> | Earlier on in the thread it was stated that there was no utility to
> | display the contents of a user space.  For example, if you wanted to
> see
> | if your program was updating it properly.  Thus, in that case, DSPF is
> a
> | valid utility.  I suppose you could do a DMPOBJ, but I think that is 
> even
> | more 'dweeby'.
> |
> | Rob Berendt
> 
> | "jt" <jt@xxxxxx>
> | Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> | 03/21/2004 12:53 PM
> 
> | Didn't know that, Colin.
> |
> | But WHY would anybody WANT to do this??  (I used EDTF.. like once or 
> twice
> | was enuf, iirc.)  I mean, as opposed to STRSEU QGPL/STRCODE...
> |
> | *Nix-like attitude won out again, apparently.  Never surprises me, but
> | then,
> | never ceases to amaze me either.
> |
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
-- 
 
  michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free
_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.