|
-----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jon Paris Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:20 AM To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: V5R3 >> >> This is not rocket science, IBM has to either get on board with CLI ( >>search the web for ECMA CLI ) or improve ILE. >I don't disagree about the importance of CLI. I just don't believe that it >will be the deciding factor in the live/die decision. okay. What about what it indicates about the level of commitment to the operating system/programming language market? MS is spending billions on its languages and operating systems. Is IBM willing to match that spending to remain competitive? >From the MS site it would appear that the source code for a port is >available. Since the code supplied will run on BSD how hard can it be to >port to Linux/AIX on the iSeries. For that matter how hard is a native >port? If Mono ( an open source CLI/C# project ) was running on the Linux side of the iSeries, the benefits would not be available where they are needed, in the RPG and Java appl development. It is ILE C++ and Java that have to be made CLI compliant. >In other words - what has ILE got to do with it. ILE is not just the iSeries's version of CLI, it is all of IBM's. With ILE trailing CLI feature wise, with MS still working to improve CLI while IBM is not working to improve ILE, you really have to wonder what is going on. -Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.