|
Colin, I would start using one field in the FRF as the base field to refer to in other DDS based objects, like PFs, DSPFs and PRTFs. Perhaps a good idea to build a new FRF with that approach. For instance: how many fields are defined for prices. You only have to define one with the required length and format and have the other fields refer to that. If the field length has to be changed, you only have to make the change once. Just a thought. Regards, Carel Teijgeler *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 27-10-03 at 17:25 Colin Williams wrote: >We use a field reference file to hold every field in every file in our main >application, so that we have unique file names across our app. > >Unfortunately we have reached the maximum record length for a file, so can no >longer add fields to our current field reference file. > >Can anyone think of a way to overcome this problem, and does anyone know if >the maximum record length increased in V5R2
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.