|
I have probably mentioned before that we have a number of solutions for testing including the reduction of test data - that can save space, and also the scrambling or test data for "anonymous" testing. Jamie Coles Original Software +44 (0)1256 338666 (UK & Worldwide) (630) 268-1488 (North America) jcoles@xxxxxxxxxxxx www.origsoft.com Leading automated testing solutions for the IBM iSeries, Microsoft & Oracle. ________________________________________________ Original Software does not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was sent. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individuals or entity to whom they are addressed -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Johnson Sent: 22 October 2003 15:27 To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Test Development System Survey (HIPAA) I went back to the archives to search for this discussion that I recalled reading (it was from July 2003 titled "Test Development System Survey")... <clip> We are currently using our AS400 production box for development as well (the test/production systems are separated by logins/environment variables). How many of you all also combine both on one machine, and has this caused performance problems for you? Or do you use a test machine for development specifically because of this (or wish you had one)? <clip> We also have one iSeries partition housing all of our environments (Lawson HCM). I'm starting to hear news that we will be moving our dev/test environments to a separate partition due to HIPAA requirements. Has anyone else started to hear the same, or already acted on HIPAA requirements by splitting environments yet? Any tips/benefits/drawbacks for having Lawson 7.2.2.6 Prod/Dev environments on separate iSeries partitions? I saw a couple of strings in the archives that mentioned HIPAA requirements, but they didn't appear to focus on the issue of splitting Prod/Dev/Test environments in order to comply with the extensive set of privacy/security standards that are defined by HIPAA. I don't want to resurrect the original discussion as to which methodology is better... However, as a sidebar, I would like to know if anyone has been able to tie Osama Bin Laden or Al-Qaida to the creation of the HIPAA requirements. <grin> Thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.