|
--- David Gibbs <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > G Armour wrote: > >>I did search - and I didn't find the answer. > > Admittedly, the archives search function leaves alot to be desired. > > How so? > > I'd be interested in any and all ideas on how to improve the archives, > the lists, etc. The boolean search doesn't appear to work for phrases and it seems to ignore the NOT argument. Wait, hold on that last one. It helps to select the boolean function. <g> OK, boolean NOT does work! But there is, apparently, no way to search on exact phrases and this, IMO, is a serious shortcoming of any search engine. As for using google and site:midrange.com, I've found that there are ommissions, even for stuff that is several months old. GA __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
